According to the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, a fatal vehicle-versus-pedestrian collision occurred on the evening of April 12th, 2026, on Boulder Highway south of East Oakey Boulevard, near downtown Las Vegas. The LVMPD report states that a 43-year-old male pedestrian in a wheelchair was crossing the northbound lanes of Boulder Highway from east to west, outside of any marked or unmarked crosswalk, when he entered the path of a northbound 2013 KIA Optima. The left front of the KIA struck the pedestrian and his wheelchair, projecting him into the dirt center median.

Arriving medical personnel pronounced the pedestrian deceased at the scene. The driver, identified as Johnny Richardson Jr., 50, of Las Vegas, stopped and called 9-1-1 but was subsequently arrested on suspicion of DUI. This collision is the 39th traffic-related fatality in LVMPD’s jurisdiction for 2026.

Based on these reported facts, a lawyer would quickly identify several overlapping legal issues: potential driver impairment, the pedestrian’s position outside a crosswalk, and the comparative-fault framework that Nevada courts apply when both parties may share some responsibility for a collision. Nevada follows a modified comparative negligence rule under NRS 41.141, which generally permits an injured person or their family to recover so long as their share of fault is not greater than that of the parties they are claiming against, with any recovery reduced proportionally by fault. The collision remains under investigation, and final fault findings may depend on the full Metro report and preserved video.

Read additional coverage from KTNV here.

Reported Details and What They May Mean for a Claim

• Crash type and location: Vehicle-versus-pedestrian collision on Boulder Highway (also referenced as Fremont Street in the corridor) south of East Oakey Boulevard, in the northbound travel lanes, near downtown Las Vegas
• Pedestrian’s actions: A 43-year-old male in a wheelchair was crossing northbound lanes from east to west, outside of a marked or unmarked crosswalk, according to LVMPD
• Vehicle and driver: Johnny Richardson Jr., 50, Las Vegas, operating a 2013 KIA Optima northbound; he stopped immediately and called 9-1-1
• Suspected impairment: The driver displayed signs of impairment and was arrested on suspicion of DUI, per the LVMPD report
• Fatality: The pedestrian, a 43-year-old male Las Vegas resident, was pronounced deceased at the scene; identity pending notification
• Witness: A witness statement contributed to the collision reconstruction, per the LVMPD release

These reported facts may raise several issues relevant to a civil claim. A lawyer would examine whether the driver’s alleged impairment was a contributing cause of the collision, and whether the pedestrian’s crossing outside a crosswalk may give rise to comparative-fault arguments. The presence of a witness at the scene may provide important testimony about the sequence of events, visibility conditions at that late hour, and the respective positions of the vehicle and wheelchair user. Preliminary news reports may not contain final police findings. A lawyer would seek the official Las Vegas Metro crash report for more complete details.

Key evidence a lawyer would work to preserve and obtain in a case like this includes: the official LVMPD Collision Investigation Section report (which may include an officer’s diagram, witness information, and DUI testing results), 9-1-1 recordings, toxicology results from the driver’s DUI arrest, traffic or business surveillance camera footage from nearby Boulder Highway businesses, scene photographs, and vehicle Event Data Recorder (EDR) data from the KIA Optima. Preserving surveillance footage is a priority because cameras along this corridor may overwrite footage within days. A lawyer would typically send a preservation letter to nearby businesses and the city promptly.

Legal Issues in a DUI-Related Pedestrian Fatality Under Nevada Law

Investigators will determine the exact cause of this crash. The following is a general overview of how Nevada law may apply to this type of accident.

Under Nevada law, drivers generally owe a duty of care toward pedestrians on or near the roadway (NRS 484B.280). A lawyer would examine whether the driver may have failed to observe or react to the wheelchair user in the roadway, and whether impairment allegedly contributed to any failure to yield or reduce speed. Pedestrians also have duties under Nevada law, and a lawyer would carefully evaluate whether the pedestrian’s crossing outside a crosswalk may factor into the comparative negligence analysis. Under NRS 41.141, even if both parties bear some degree of fault, the pedestrian’s surviving family may still have a viable wrongful death claim so long as the pedestrian’s share of fault is not found to be greater than the driver’s.

The reported DUI arrest is a significant factor in the civil analysis, separate from any criminal proceedings. Nevada law prohibits operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol or drugs (NRS 484C.110), and a DUI arrest, if supported by the developed evidence may become important proof of negligence in a civil case. Under Nevada’s amended statute NRS 42.010, punitive damages may be available in civil cases where a driver willfully consumed alcohol and caused injury or death by operating a motor vehicle. Depending on later-developed facts, a lawyer may examine whether that standard could be met in a case like this, though it is a high bar and would depend on the final record.

Because the pedestrian was killed, surviving family members may have a wrongful death claim under NRS 41.085. That statute may allow certain heirs, which can include a spouse, children, or parents depending on family circumstances, to seek compensation for medical expenses incurred before death, funeral and burial costs, lost future income and support, and loss of companionship. The statute of limitations for wrongful death claims is generally two years from the date of death under NRS 11.190(4)(d), making prompt legal action important to preserve those rights.

On the criminal side, the driver’s arrest on suspicion of DUI following a fatal collision may lead to charges under NRS 484C.430 (DUI causing death), which is a Category B felony in Nevada carrying significant prison exposure. Whether vehicular homicide charges under NRS 484C.130 may apply would depend on whether the driver has prior DUI convictions, facts that are not reported in the initial release. A lawyer handling the civil claim would monitor the criminal case closely, as any criminal conviction may become relevant evidence in the parallel civil proceeding.

How a Lawyer May Investigate a Fatal DUI Pedestrian Crash in Las Vegas

Serious injury and fatal crashes usually require a fast, thorough legal investigation.

• Obtain the LVMPD Collision Investigation Section report: This report may include the responding officer’s observations, a crash diagram showing vehicle and pedestrian positions, witness contact information, and any citations or arrest information, providing the factual foundation for the civil case.
• Secure toxicology and DUI arrest records: Results of chemical testing (blood or breath) from the driver’s DUI arrest may become key evidence of impairment. A lawyer would seek these records promptly, as they may be critical to both liability and a punitive-damages analysis under NRS 42.010.
• Preserve surveillance and traffic camera footage: Boulder Highway is an active commercial corridor, and nearby businesses or city cameras may have captured the collision. Footage is often overwritten within days, so a preservation letter should be sent immediately after retaining counsel.
• Interview the eyewitness: The LVMPD release references a witness whose statement contributed to the collision reconstruction. Witness recollections fade, and obtaining a full, detailed statement early may be important to address any comparative-fault arguments about the pedestrian’s crossing location.
• Collect vehicle EDR (black box) data: The KIA Optima’s Event Data Recorder may contain speed, braking, and steering inputs from the moments before the collision. A lawyer would issue a spoliation letter to prevent the vehicle from being repaired or data overwritten.
• Identify all available insurance coverage: A lawyer would review the driver’s personal auto liability policy and assess the policy limits in light of the severity of the fatality. If the driver’s liability coverage is insufficient, a lawyer would examine whether any other policies including the decedent’s own household auto policies may provide additional coverage through uninsured or underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) provisions under NRS 690B.020.

Using this evidence, a lawyer would work to establish the driver’s negligence, address any comparative-fault arguments regarding the pedestrian’s position outside a crosswalk, and document the full range of damages available to the family under a wrongful death claim. The DUI arrest also may open the door to a punitive-damages analysis depending on the developed record, which could substantially affect the value of a civil claim.

Potential claims in a case like this may include wrongful death under NRS 41.085 on behalf of the decedent’s eligible heirs, negligence based on the driver’s alleged impairment and failure to avoid the pedestrian, and depending on later-developed facts, punitive damages under NRS 42.010 if the evidence supports the driver willfully consumed alcohol before operating the vehicle.

What to Know After a Fatal Pedestrian Accident in Nevada

Family members of someone killed in a traffic collision should seek legal advice promptly. Some injuries and conditions are not immediately apparent, and while physical injury may not be at issue for surviving family, the legal and financial consequences of a wrongful death can be far-reaching. Surviving family members should avoid giving recorded statements to insurance adjusters before consulting with an attorney, and should preserve any evidence they may have, including photographs, witness contact information, and any correspondence from law enforcement or insurance companies.

Nevada’s statute of limitations means that a wrongful death claim generally must be filed within two years of the date of death under NRS 11.190(4)(d). Missing this deadline may permanently bar recovery. An attorney may help identify all potentially liable parties, preserve critical evidence before it is lost, and evaluate all available insurance coverage, including UM/UIM policies that may apply even when the at-fault driver’s coverage is insufficient.

Serious fatal crashes may result in significant financial losses for surviving family members, including lost income and financial support, funeral and burial costs, and the lasting emotional impact on those left behind. Documenting these losses fully from the date of the crash forward may be important to any claim for compensation under Nevada’s wrongful death framework.

Seeking Legal Help After a Las Vegas Pedestrian Fatality

Family members of someone killed in a pedestrian accident in Las Vegas or Clark County may have legal options worth evaluating, even when questions of comparative fault are present such as when a pedestrian was crossing outside a crosswalk. The combination of a reported DUI arrest and a fatal outcome may significantly affect the civil liability analysis and the range of damages that could potentially be pursued. Evidence preservation deadlines and the two-year statute of limitations for wrongful death claims make early consultation with a qualified Nevada personal injury attorney an important step for any family considering their legal options after a crash like this one.

---

The information in this article reflects laws and facts reported as of the date of publication. Nevada law may change. This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by reading or sharing this content. If you have been injured in an accident, consult a qualified Nevada attorney for advice specific to your situation.