According to the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, on the evening of May 28, 2026, a vehicle versus pedestrian collision occurred on South Decatur Boulevard, south of Spring Mountain Road, in the Chinatown area of Las Vegas. A 2013 Toyota RAV4, driven by 27-year-old Victoria Truong of Las Vegas, was traveling southbound in the left travel lane when a 35-year-old male pedestrian crossed Decatur Boulevard outside of a marked or implied crosswalk. The front of the Toyota struck the pedestrian, who was then run over by the vehicle. Despite life-saving efforts by arriving medical personnel, the pedestrian was pronounced deceased at the scene via telemetry. Truong remained at the scene and reportedly displayed signs of impairment; she was later arrested on DUI-related charges.

Based on the reported facts, a lawyer would examine several legal questions, including the driver’s alleged impairment, the pedestrian’s position outside a marked or implied crosswalk, and the potential application of Nevada’s modified comparative negligence rule under NRS 41.141. Because a DUI arrest was explicitly reported, a lawyer may also examine punitive-damages issues under NRS 42.005, depending on later-developed facts. The collision remains under investigation, and final fault findings may depend on the full Metro report and preserved video. Read the original report here.

Reported Details and What They May Mean for a Claim

• Crash type and location: Vehicle versus pedestrian collision on South Decatur Boulevard, south of Spring Mountain Road, in the Chinatown corridor of southwest Las Vegas, on the evening of May 28, 2026
• Vehicle involved: A 2013 Toyota RAV4, traveling southbound in the left travel lane of three lanes
• Pedestrian’s position: According to LVMPD, the pedestrian was crossing Decatur Boulevard from west to east outside of a marked or implied crosswalk at the time of the collision
• Impact sequence: The front of the Toyota collided with the pedestrian, who was projected forward and subsequently run over by the vehicle
• Fatality: The 35-year-old male pedestrian was pronounced deceased at the scene; his identity is pending notification
• DUI arrest: The driver, Victoria Truong, 27, remained at the scene, reportedly displayed signs of impairment, and was later arrested on DUI-related charges
• Evidence noted: LVMPD reports that witness statements and surveillance video were part of the investigation
• Traffic fatality count: This death was recorded as the 49th traffic-related fatality in LVMPD’s jurisdiction for 2026

These reported facts may raise several legal issues. A lawyer would examine whether the driver’s alleged impairment may establish liability under Nevada law, and how the pedestrian’s crossing outside a crosswalk may factor into any comparative-fault analysis. The existence of surveillance video and witness statements, as noted in the LVMPD release, may be important to how fault is ultimately assessed.

Preliminary news reports may not contain final police findings. A lawyer would seek the official Las Vegas Metro crash report for more complete details. Key records typically sought in a case like this include the police collision report, 911 and dispatch recordings, scene photographs and vehicle damage documentation, witness statements, DUI arrest records and chemical test results, medical records from the scene and any treating providers, and surveillance footage from nearby businesses and traffic cameras. Obtaining these records early may be important because footage is often overwritten within days.

Legal Issues in a DUI Pedestrian Fatality Under Nevada Law

Investigators will determine the exact cause of this crash. The following is a general overview of how Nevada law may apply to this type of accident.

Nevada law generally requires drivers to exercise due care toward pedestrians on or near a roadway (NRS 484B.280). A lawyer would examine whether the driver may have failed to meet that standard, particularly in light of the reported DUI arrest. At the same time, pedestrians also have duties under Nevada law, and the fact that the pedestrian was reportedly crossing outside a marked or implied crosswalk may become relevant to any comparative-fault analysis.

Nevada law prohibits driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs (NRS 484C.110). A reported DUI arrest or citation may become significant evidence in a civil case, though the civil analysis still depends on the full record developed over time. Because a DUI arrest was explicitly reported here, a lawyer may examine whether punitive damages under NRS 42.005 could be available if the evidence supports a finding that the driver acted with oppression, fraud, or malice. That is a high bar, and any such analysis would depend on later-developed facts, including the outcome of the criminal proceedings.

Under NRS 41.141, Nevada follows a modified comparative negligence rule. Generally, an injured person or their survivors may recover so long as the fault attributed to the injured party is not greater than the combined fault of the parties being sued. Any recovery may be reduced proportionally by the injured party’s percentage of fault. In a fatal pedestrian case where the pedestrian was reportedly outside a crosswalk, a lawyer would carefully investigate all facts before assessing how comparative fault might apply.

Because the pedestrian died, this incident may also give rise to a wrongful death claim under NRS 41.085. Eligible claimants may include the pedestrian’s surviving heirs, such as a spouse, children, or parents, depending on the family circumstances. Recoverable damages in a wrongful death case may include medical expenses incurred before death, funeral and burial costs, lost future income and financial support, and the surviving family’s loss of companionship, depending on the structure of the claim and the evidence presented.

Under NRS 11.190(4)(e) and NRS 11.190(4)(d), personal injury and wrongful death claims arising from vehicle crashes in Nevada generally carry a two-year deadline from the date of the crash or death. Missing that deadline may permanently bar a claim, so prompt legal review may be important for the pedestrian’s surviving family members.

How a Lawyer May Investigate This Type of Fatal Crash in Las Vegas

Serious injury and fatal crashes usually require a fast, thorough legal investigation.

• Obtain the Las Vegas Metro collision report. The LVMPD Collision Investigation Section is handling this case. The crash report may include the responding officers’ observations, a scene diagram, witness contact information, and any citations or arrest details. This document is often a starting point for evaluating fault.
• Preserve surveillance and traffic camera footage immediately. LVMPD’s release noted that surveillance video was reviewed as part of the investigation. The Chinatown corridor near Decatur and Spring Mountain has numerous businesses with exterior cameras. A lawyer would send preservation letters quickly because footage is often overwritten within 24 to 72 hours.
• Secure the DUI arrest records and chemical test results. If the driver’s blood alcohol or drug levels are part of the arrest record, those results may become key evidence in both the criminal and any civil proceedings. A lawyer would monitor the criminal case closely, as the outcome may affect the civil analysis.
• Interview witnesses promptly. Witness statements were reportedly collected by LVMPD. Independent witness interviews may uncover additional details about the driver’s conduct, vehicle speed, lighting, and the pedestrian’s position and movement before impact.
• Preserve vehicle data. Many modern vehicles, including a 2013 Toyota RAV4, may contain an Event Data Recorder (EDR) that logs speed, braking, and steering inputs in the seconds before a collision. A lawyer would issue a spoliation letter to preserve this data before the vehicle is repaired or otherwise altered.
• Assess all available insurance coverage. A lawyer would identify all potentially applicable liability policies, including the driver’s auto insurance, and evaluate whether coverage limits may be sufficient given the fatal outcome. UM/UIM coverage issues may also be examined depending on the coverage available.

Using this evidence, a lawyer would work to assess liability, address any comparative-fault arguments that may be raised based on the pedestrian’s reported location outside a crosswalk, and document the full extent of damages claimed by the pedestrian’s surviving family. Because a DUI arrest was reported and criminal proceedings may follow, a lawyer would also evaluate the timing of any civil filing, weighing the benefits of early evidence preservation against the potential strategic value of monitoring criminal developments first.

Possible civil claims may include negligence against the driver, wrongful death under NRS 41.085 on behalf of the pedestrian’s heirs, and potentially punitive damages under NRS 42.005 given the explicitly reported DUI arrest, depending on later-developed facts and the full evidentiary record.

What to Know After a Fatal Pedestrian Crash in Nevada

For surviving family members of a pedestrian killed in a crash like this one, the first priority is obtaining proper legal counsel before providing recorded statements to any insurance adjuster. Statements made early in the process, without full knowledge of the facts or legal implications, can sometimes be used in ways that complicate a later claim. Preserving all available evidence, including photos of the scene, witness contact information, and any communications received from insurers, may be important from the outset.

Nevada’s statute of limitations generally gives surviving family members two years from the date of death to file a wrongful death claim under NRS 11.190. Missing that deadline may permanently bar recovery. An attorney may help identify potentially liable parties, evaluate the available insurance coverage, preserve critical evidence before it is lost, and assess whether a DUI arrest may support additional claims, including punitive damages under the applicable statute.

Fatal crashes involving alleged DUI may result in parallel criminal proceedings against the driver. While the criminal case may ultimately provide important evidence for a civil claim, the civil and criminal processes operate independently. Surviving family members may have legal options worth evaluating regardless of how the criminal proceedings unfold or how long they take to resolve.

Seeking Legal Help After a Las Vegas Pedestrian Fatality

If you are a surviving family member of someone killed in a pedestrian accident in Las Vegas or Clark County, Nevada law may allow you to pursue a wrongful death claim. In cases involving an alleged DUI driver, there may be additional legal avenues worth examining, including punitive damages, depending on the facts developed through investigation. Evidence from the crash scene, surveillance footage, and criminal case records can become important to a civil claim, but some of that evidence must be preserved quickly. Speaking with a qualified Nevada personal injury attorney may be an important early step for any family evaluating their legal options after a fatal pedestrian crash.

---

The information in this article reflects laws and facts reported as of the date of publication. Nevada law may change. This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by reading or sharing this content. If you have been injured in an accident, consult a qualified Nevada attorney for advice specific to your situation.